Archive for the 'branding' Category

Page 3 of 5

SmallBusinessBranding.com Growth

SBB.com is really beginning to take off. Our readership is increasing almost daily and we just redesigned the site to stay current. Here are some of the latest posts by author:

Nick Rice

Kammie Kobyleski

Robert Kingston

Brad Williamson

Jeff Barson

Danielle Rodgers

technorati tags > small, business, branding, marketing, strategy, techniques

What are you the best at?

There’s a big push towards niche marketing. Here, Here, Here. As more and more markets commoditize, brand becomes a critical factor. And in most large cash cow commodity markets, there are only two or three major players. Everybody else is left picking at single digit marketshare with little to no growth opportunities.

So you have basically two options for growth. One, you can launch a break-through product or service in your category. Think bagless vacuum cleaners. When there were only bagged vacuums, everybody was pretty much equal. Then the bagless came out in Japan and revolutionized the market – and put most of the aftermarket bag suppliers out of business. It was a game changer. Before that product came out people just assumed you needed a bag to catch the dust.

The second method is to be seen as “head and shoulders” better than anything else in the market. Think Dyson. Until that brand was launched there was little growth or movement in vacuum cleaners. Now Dyson is stealing share from everyone. They really didn’t invent anything new or revolutionary. They’ve done a great job of promoting the things people really care about – weak vacuums that lose suction and pass a lot of dust through back to the carpet. And they’ve done it with stylish advertising and marketing. They look high tech, expensive, and worth it. The funny thing with Dyson is that he was not trained as an engineer, but as an industrial designer. He’s turned a stale market on its end and is raking in the profits.

More and more firms are moving to a niche marketing strategy. They want to be seen as the best provider of a very specific offering. The Long Tail theory tells us that a lot of small providers with very passionate customers can be as powerful as one or two large providers – that they control more of the marketplace than previously realized. The hard part is getting them organized and focused towards a common goal.

Very few firms in the world can be a Wal*Mart (in fact no one can). The average retailer cannot compete with Wal*Mart. So my advice is to not compete at all. You can make a lot of money offering the high-end products that they cannot. You can make a lot of money providing products that are above Target. So why should it surprise or anger people when Wal*Mart puts small Mom & Pop’s out of business. They simply need to adapt with unique offerings. They’ll be more profitable and sustain future growth. In theory, Mom & Pop shops have the advantage of convenience. They should be closer to their customers and they definitely have potential for much better customer service.

So, you will be relegated to commodity status if you cannot easily answer and defend what you are the best at. Start planning now how your products and services can change the game or stand out from the competition. Once you can easily answer the question, your audience will begin to find you. People are always looking for specialists to solve their problems. Being recognized as an expert makes your marketing efforts a lot easier. Jeffrey Gitomer said it best, “No one wants to be sold, but everyone likes to buy.” Being seen as a specialist creates a buying environment, not a sales situation. Even after you are seen as a specialist, you still need to market. Marketing gives you the ability to even further refine your customer set and profitability criteria. It’s about creating more demand than capacity. It’s about creating choices.

What do you do better than anyone?

technorati tags > marketing, strategy, niche, small, big, long tail

Marcom Vocabulary

Had to pass on a great marketing communications primer from Ernie Mosteller. Being on the same page with regards to vocabulary is one of the most effective ways to ensure that your projects come in on strategy, time, and budget. Ernie does a great job of boiling down the basics…

Brand.
Your brand is your personality, as determined by how the world sees you. How you want to be seen can affect how the world sees you, but it doesn’t define it. The world gets to define its own take on you. Lots of things go into what the world sees of you. Your brand = (what you want it to be) + 2(X) what the world says it is. The world’s actual view of you is at least twice as important as your desired view of you. As the world’s view of you becomes more negative, X gets larger. As it becomes more positive, X shrinks.

Design.
Design is not your brand. But it can affect your brand. Design is the clothes you wear in order to attempt to affect the world’s perception of your personality. It may also be the car you drive, or the house you live in. It’s your outward, visual, projection to the world. It may or may not have anything at all to do with who you really are — though good design is always based on what’s inside. Design can, and should, touch everything you do that the world sees. Which, basically, is everything.

Advertising.
Advertising is not your brand. Advertising is what you say about yourself in order to attempt to affect the world’s perception of your personality. What you say can also be defined as: how you act in public. Which is, everywhere. What you say about yourself is greatly affected by how you say it, because how you say it determines whether people will hear and/or listen. Whispering in the middle of an NFL stadium doesn’t have the same effect as shouting in church. If I were you, I wouldn’t do either. Advertising, by the way, is no longer defined as the placement of a pre-determined message in a purchased medium. Advertising is any piece of communications with an agenda.

Public Relations.
PR is not your brand. PR is an active attempt to get other people to say something positive about you, without directly paying them to do so. Because this definition is so broad, and so clearly goes light years beyond churning out a press release, you can safely assume that I believe PR is pretty much anything, and is an integral, specialized component of quality advertising. PR is also the component you need to turn to for crisis management, assuming you’re managing the crisis honestly. Because almost anything else has a real chance of making things worse.

Collateral.
Collateral is not your brand. Collateral is reference material for people who have already expressed an interest in your brand. Whether it’s a business card or brochure, collateral has almost no ability to create interest in you. Its function is to enhance interest, and provide information, for those who have already decided (if even in a small way) to check you out. Most websites function as collateral, though they are capable of a lot more.

Concept.
A concept is no longer simply a storyboard, or a headline/visual relationship. A concept is an idea designed to encourage a specific action from the person who interacts with it. A concept could be an event, a direct mail piece, a Super Bowl commercial, a You Tube video, a boy band, or a newspaper ad. The key to making a concept work is to focus your attention on the desired action from the viewer, and simplify that action to its most basic element. A concept doesn’t sell a car. A salesman sells a car. But the right concept can get someone to talk to a salesman. Or click a link. Or remember the car you have for sale, the next time they think about buying one. Good concepts surprise people. Great concepts hold their attention. Effective concepts are very specific, and very simplistic, about what they want to achieve.

technorati tags > ernie mosteller, marketing, communication, vocabulary

The effect collateral and manuals have on purchase, loyalty, and the user experience

Kathy Sierra has a great post on how much time, effort, and branding is put into creating pre-sales materials while post-sales material like user manuals is pure function.

I find it interesting how corporations are structured to support this mismatch. Marketing handles the glossy slick brochures and outer packaging, while either engineering or Pubs handles the user manuals, set up guides, packing materials, and quick reference sheets in most companies. Very few companies put a lot of thought into creating an experience that is reflective of the brand after a user buys their widget. I know we talk a lot about Apple in the design and user experience space, but they truly do take every opportunity to create loyal customers. Everything from pre-sales collateral to unpacking the device to installing the software and using it has been thought through from the point of view of a normal user not an engineer buried deep within a company that sees these products every day. That creates passionate users. Passion breeds loyalty. And loyal users are a key component of keeping the doors open and the lights on long term.

Here’s a great quote from Kathy:

As a potential customer, I’ll find your attention to user learning a lot more convincing than your attention to new sales. Rather than using your brochure to show how much YOU kick ass, I’d much rather see no-marketing-spin hard evidence of how you’re going to help ME kick ass.

Kathy reminds us that users don’t care about your features. They only care about how improve their daily life. When a user sees your product as an enabler to getting more done or doing things better, they become loyal. If you concentrate your efforts on generating loyal customers, you’ll quickly discover that you need to focus more on the activities that happen post-sale. If you offer generous support, information, and ease of use as soon as they open the box you will create loyal users.

Obviously you have to get people to buy your products first so I’m not saying shift all of your resources. The glossy slick brochures, have their place. And are very effective at what they’re designed to do. I’m just saying put more thought into how you can improve the user experience throughout the life of your product not just pre-sale.

technorati tags > presales, post, sales, collateral, user, experience, customer, loyalty, marketing, publications

Best blogs in Branding

Small Business Branding and Marketing was named on the Canadian Trademark blog as one of the branding blogs they’re tracking.

I’m proud to contribute to a site that’s so well respected. Keep your eyes open for some major changes we have coming in the next few months.

technorati tags > small business, branding, marketing, branding blogs, small business branding, small business marketing

My posts on Small Business Branding & Marketing

With vacation winding down, here are my posts from my other blog, Small Business Branding & Marketing

The Power of the White Envelope

Role of Creativity in Business

How to Succeed with Direct Marketing

Lead Generation Strategy for Small Business

5 Tips for Getting the Biggest Bang for your Buck

Let me know your thoughts.

technorati tags > small business, smb, branding, marketing, strategy, nick rice

Standing between OK and remarkable

Since I’m off enjoying a few days at the beach, I thought I’d just pass on some wisdom from Seth Godin.

http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/08/awkward.html

technorati tags > seth godin, awkward, product, strategy

Brand adjectives and alignment

I run across a lot of marketing managers that continue to think of their brand as their logo. Obviously there is much more to your brand than just your logo mark. I’ve read all of the classic brand definitions and here is mine:

Your brand is defined by the individual gut feelings of those people that has been exposed to your company and/or products and services.

Notice that they do not have to be current or previous customers; nor do they need direct contact with your offerings or corporation.

One thing that we tend to do with customers is get them talking about brands they favor. Doesn’t matter who or what. But it’s all about describing the company without necessarily talking about their products. Here are some examples:

Nike

  • fitness
  • athletic
  • speed
  • innovation
  • not as globally focused as Adidas

Chase Manhattan

  • late fees
  • always merging w/ another bank
  • lots of direct mail

Red Lobster

  • hopefully fresh
  • suburban
  • decent substitute for the real thing
  • average

Adobe

  • in touch w/ the creative industry
  • don’t screw up the Macromedia apps
  • trusted

A lot of product-driven companies like to talk about product features or industry jargon. No normal customer thinks that way. Most users are very pragmatic about their brand impressions. It’s basically a bell curve. They love a few brands, hate a few brands, and most are just stuck in the middle. If you can become loved, you’ll grow profitably. Preference leads to loyalty and that’s a powerful position.

If you’re responsible for marketing products, I contend that you must know what your customers and the general public think of your brand. Overlay that with your desired brand adjectives. If there is a gap, you’ve got a problem. And unfortunately you cannot fix it immediately – simply because you cannot completely control your brand. The best you can hope for is alignment between those gut feelings about your company, products, services and your vision.

What do you want to be known for? And don’t cop out by saying “exemplary customer service” or “industry leading whatever” or some crap like that. It’s hard work to change gut feelings. But you can with innovation and communication – and time. Consistent alignment is the primary driver of brand strength.

Do you have an alignment issue with your brand?

technorati tags > branding, marketing, strategy, alignment, brand promise, gut feelings,

The right priorites

This image from Hugh Macleod got me thinking.

Trust in a seller/customer relationship truly is paramount. Big advertising blew it – people are sick of being screamed at. Big business blew it – employment for life? The social media push is all about trust. It’s an amplified globe-shrinking Word of Mouth push. It is about customers taking back control and recognizing the power of their tribe.

I’ve seen it happen a thousand times – and I’m guilty of it myself. Once a creative firm (in-house or outside) sells a new idea; the client usually jumps right into “so how are we going to do it”. I’ve always thought they should be more concerned about ensuring their brand is elevated in the eyes of the customer instead of the technical details. I’m sure the thought process is “if I understand how it’s going to work, I’ll be able to know if it’s right”.

Most clients are focused on the wrong thing and it’s puts them at a disadvantage that is next to impossible to overcome. Focus on what your customer wants to hear (the why), not the technology (the what or how). Focus on solving the true business problem that’s prompting you to market/publicize/advertise/etc… Be brave enough to peel back the layers and write an honest creative brief. Make trust a priority.

technorati tags > marketing, branding, advertising, priorities, strategy, customer, trust

Simple vs. Dumb

Great post from Mary Schmidt.

The summary is that “dumbing down” your marketing so that it seemingly appeals to all audiences is the wrong thing to do. That tactic will appeal to no one. On the other hand, simplifying your message so that it’s easily understood and actionable is key to connecting with your customers/clients/prospects/etc…

New technology, being constantly connected, and having fewer hours in the day have created an environment where people are demanding more control over their marketing & sales exposures. You have to keep your message short, unique, value laden, and available on their terms to gain traction.

technorati tags > marketing, advertising, strategies, consumers, messaging, targeting